Subscribe Via RSS RSS Feeds
About The Blog
The Legal Beat was developed as a way to showcase lawyers who have a certain level of expertise in a practice area. If you would like to be featured in an article, video, or podcast, click here.
Blog Categories

View All Categories

Attorney Malpractice
Business Development Skills
Career Corner
CLE Programming
Employment Law
Entrepreneurship
Friday Five
Law Firms
Law School
Lawline.com
Lawyer Profiles
Marketing Tips
Opinion Corner
Podcasts
Press Release
SEO
SHOWCASE CORNER
Technology Corner
The News Beat
Videos

Recent Supreme Court Opinions
Posted: June 26th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: Opinion Corner, The News Beat

Recent Supreme Court Opinions

As the US Supreme Court nears the end of this term, we have received decisions on many of the major cases it has heard recently. Here is a shortlist of the winners and losers in each.

1. Exxon Valdez Punitive Damages Slashed to $507 Million. Originally ordered to pay punitive damages of $2.5 billion for an oil spill in 1989, the Supreme Court has given Exxon the benefit of the doubt in a 5-3 decision.   Winners: Exxon Valdez. Losers: The Environment.

2. DC Gun Ban Tossed Out. A 32-year ban on handguns for individual civilians in DC was ruled unconstitutional and a direct violation of the second amendment right to bear arms. Winners: Gun Manufacturers, an Old Piece of Paper. Losers: The American People.

3. No Death Penalty for Child Rapists. The Supreme Court called the death penalty “cruel and unusual punishment” in cases of child rape. In rare agreement, both presidential candidates Obama and McCain condemned the decision. Winners: Not Really Sure. Losers: Children and their Parents.

4. Guantanamo Bay Inmates Can Challenge their Detention. Long held against their will without any explanation or legal proceedings, suspected terrorists at Guantanamo Bay now have the right to challenge their detention before the court. Winners: Justice and Fairness, Detainees. Losers: George Bush and Co.

Post a Comment   |   (0) Comments  |   Permanent Link  Go Back


Is the Legal Field Facing a Supply and Demand Imbalance of Top Talent?
Posted: June 25th, 2008
By: Charles Volkert, Esq.
Category: Law Firms, Law School, Opinion Corner

Is the Legal Field Facing a Supply and Demand Imbalance of Top Talent?

The convergence of a number of demographic, economic and social trends is making it more challenging than ever for law firms and corporate legal departments to attract, groom and retain top legal professionals. Best Practices for Recruiting, Developing and Retaining Top Legal Talent, a new white paper from Robert Half Legal, a legal staffing service specializing in attorneys, paralegals and other highly skilled legal professionals provides an overview of the business and demographic trends that are reshaping the legal field.
 
The legal profession is facing staffing challenges caused by diminished law school enrollment, increased lateral movement of midlevel associates, seasoned talent opting out of the profession, and the pending retirement of the baby boomer generation. As a result, competition for talent among law firms and corporate legal departments has intensified and law offices are re-evaluating the way they hire, motivate, promote and retain top performers, particularly women and minorities, two groups with high attrition rates.
 
Law firms and legal departments recognize that they have reached a crucial moment in which they must develop and implement policy changes that meet the needs and priorities of today’s legal workforce. Even some of the most tradition-bound law offices are deploying progressive staffing initiatives – from YouTube-style recruiting videos and part-time schedule options to diversity training and the elimination of mandatory retirement. The stakes are high for all law offices: If they do not innovate, they run the risk of a costly talent drain. To remain competitive, recruit and retain top talent, boost profitability, and grow their businesses, law firms and corporate legal departments must adapt their staffing and management practices.
 
Research conducted for the Future Law Office project discovered several developments that are likely to continue to impact the legal profession:

· Despite a cautious economy, demand for newly minted lawyers with the most sought-after skills and a top-tier education remains strong and is expected to outpace the supply. In addition to law degrees, the most desirable and marketable candidates also possess degrees in biology, chemistry or other sciences and technology, which allow them to better represent clients in the pharmaceutical, healthcare, biotechnology and technology industries.

· Many midlevel associates are leaving within three or four years of taking a job at a law firm. The reasons given for switching firms included a desire to move to a different geographic location, pursuit of new practice interests, change to another type of legal job, cost-of-living issues and student debt. Other factors were high billable expectations, communication problems within a firm, lack of transparency about the firm’s finances and the relatively low probability of making partner. Other midlevel associates and senior attorneys are leaving the profession entirely. Among minority associates, attrition rates are even steeper. Seasoned attorneys opt out for many of the same reasons that others make lateral moves, including changing priorities, a search for different opportunities and the desire for better work-life balance. Because attrition has historically been the cost of doing business, the financial impact of unwanted or excessive attrition can be severe. It has been estimated that the economic cost of losing an attorney may range from $300,000 to $700,000.

· As the baby boomer generation enters retirement over the next 10 years, businesses of all types will be confronted with a shortage of millions of workers and will compete for a smaller pool of younger workers with less experience and expertise. The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects a flat growth rate of less than 0.5 percent for the U.S. workforce during the next 60 years.
 
The combination of candidate shortages, overheated demand in certain practice areas, declining law school enrollment, attrition among midlevel associates, the opting out of seasoned attorneys and the looming retirement of the baby boomer generation is daunting. To survive and thrive, law offices must now take a much harder look at making significant changes in personnel practices including implementing policies to attract and retain more women and minority groups, preserve the intellectual capital of older attorneys and continue to provide work-life balance programs that address the needs of lawyers at every stage of their careers.
 
Best Practices for Recruiting, Developing and Retaining Top Legal Talent is part of Robert Half Legal’s Future Law Office project. For the annual research study, Robert Half Legal interviewed experts in law firm and corporate legal department management, our own legal staffing specialists throughout North America, and other professionals in the legal fields. Our findings also are based on extensive research from state and national legal publications, legal associations, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statistics Canada. Robert Half Legal regularly commissions surveys of attorneys on a variety of workplace and legal management issues. Relevant statistics from these studies, which include responses from 300 attorneys among the top law firms and corporate legal departments in the United States and Canada, are included in the study.
 
For a free copy of the Future Law Office white paper or for information about Robert Half Legal, please visit www.roberthalflegal.com or call 1.800.870.8367. Charles Volkert, Esq. is executuve director of Robert Half Legal, a leading staffing agency specializing in the placement of attorneys, paralegals, legal administrators and other legal professionals with law firms and corporate legal departments.

Post a Comment   |   (0) Comments  |   Permanent Link  Go Back


Smokers Need Not Apply at Rogers Towers
Posted: June 24th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: Law Firms, SHOWCASE CORNER

Smokers Need Not Apply at Rogers Towers

Aside from smoking in designated non-smoking areas and buildings, you can’t really get in trouble for smoking cigarettes. The tobacco industry is one of the largest in the country despite the vast amount of information available on the negative effects of cigarette smoke on the human body. Well, a Florida law firm is taking a stand against cigarette smoking by implementing a new hiring strategy.

Rogers Towers, a well known law firm based in Jacksonville, FL, is no longer hiring smokers starting on July 1, 2008. “It is strictly a decision to employ healthier workers,” explains Rogers Towers attorney Allan Geiger, “we are trying to help people be more healthy by giving them incentives to quit.” It was a decision that seems to fit in with the culture of the law firm overall.

The firm, which is involved in many activities promoting healthier lifestyles, is now taking the next step. Though the new policy will not apply to those smokers who already work at the firm, Rogers Towers does offer to pay for programs that help employees quit the habit. But starting in July, if an interviewee turns out to be a cigarette smoker, they will not get the job.

Florida has one of the lowest tobacco taxes in the country, which leads to a large cigarette consumption in the state. Over 1.3 billion packs of cigarettes were purchased just last year. But the winds of change are blowing. In 2007, Florida passed a constitutional amendment forcing state spending on anti-cigarette programs and campaigns.

The new Rogers Towers anti-smoking policy, though not aimed at infringing on others, will spark discussion on both sides of the issue. Murray Schwartz, a renowned employment discrimination prosecutor in New York sees this as a potential issue. “Since smoking cigarettes is not against the law, it is unlikely that you can judge someone’s employment potential based solely on whether or not they smoke,” he explained. He says that even though no law exists against this type of policy, it is a potential problem to even ask if a potential hire smokes cigarettes during the interview process.

This is an issue that is sure to spark ongoing discussion, but in the end it is a move that puts healthy living into the minds of more people. And for a country with a significant amount of health issues, this is a bold step that deserves our attention, if not praise. As Allan Geiger puts it, “In the end, it is really all about making people healthier.”

Post a Comment   |   (3) Comments  |   Permanent Link  Go Back


Friday Five: Why Start Your Own Practice
Posted: June 20th, 2008
By: Daniel Gershburg
Category: Entrepreneurship, Friday Five, Lawyer Profiles, Opinion Corner

Friday Five: Why Start Your Own Practice

If you feel as if it‘s time to start your own practice, please follow your intuition, as it is likely guiding you on the right path.  I had that feeling as soon as I left law school, followed it, and haven’t looked back since.  Having said that, please be prepared to hear the following from your family and/or friends:

1. Are you crazy?
2. So you don’t like having a salary?
3. How are you going to get clients?
4. Do you know what you’re doing?
5. Can you help me with my case (Usually comes from family…usually extended)

So…without further ado…here are the top 5 reasons to start your own firm. 

1. The experience is unlike any other
Its one thing to do work for someone else but quite another to do it for yourself.  I did not attend law school so that I could be stuck in an office writing motions for other attorneys and appearing in court for cases which are not mine.  Not that there is anything wrong with that.  It just wasn’t for me.  If you constantly have the itch that you think you could do this yourself, on your own, then do it.  If you believe that you could treat the client  much better,  then its time you think about starting your own firm. (Just don’t steal the client). 

 2. Your pay is commensurate with your work
Ever get the feeling that the firm doesn’t value your services and doesn’t pay you what you are worth.  You’re likely right.  Unless you’re a partner in one of the larger firms who, from what I understand, now get paid in Euros.  In any event the great thing about  having your own firm is that the amount of work you put in usually, but not initially, dictates how much you get paid.  Think your worth more than $200/hr, then charge more.   You may have to take a hit at first, but trust me, working on motions you don’t want to work on is much easier when the hourly rate goes into your pocket.

3. Your business cards list your name, not some other persons.
This really shouldn’t be a consideration in  deciding to go out on your own…but its pretty cool. 

4. The firm where you work oddly doesn’t allow you to practice the field of law which you enjoy
Unless you are in a very unique firm which has implemented a “Choose your favorite practice and do it!” day, you may be stuck in a situation where you are doing legal work you don’t like….over and over again.  Not only does this hamper your quality of life, but the quality of work may suffer as a result as well.  The solution.  Start your own practice.  You’ll have the ability to not only practice in the area of law you enjoy, but you’ll also be able to venture out into other areas as well.  I never though I would enjoy practicing consumer advocacy…but I do.

5. Gone Fishin….
If you have your own firm and you need to take a week off for vacation, or to leave at 3 to see your kids ball game, you do it.  No questions asked.  You’ll obviously have to compensate for the time you missed, but you still have a freedom that most other people don’t have.  You cannot put a price on that. 

Obviously this is a simplification of a very serious and personal decision, but my personal opinion really is “Do what makes you happy and others will benefit as a result".  The worst thing that can happen is that this all fails and you go back to work at another firm.  The best thing is your life changes tremendously for the better. Just my 2 cents.

Daniel Gershburg, Esq. is an attorney in Brooklyn who recently started his own practice, Gershburg Law.  He focuses his practice on real estate, bankruptcy, litigation, and criminal defense.

Post a Comment   |   (2) Comments  |   Permanent Link  Go Back


Democratization of Assets Makes Fastcase the Wave of the Future
Posted: June 18th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: Career Corner, SHOWCASE CORNER

Democratization of Assets Makes Fastcase the Wave of the Future

For years, the legal research industry has been dominated by two names, Westlaw and LexisNexis. Well those times are changing. Welcome Fastcase, Inc. Fastcase is the brainchild of Ed Walters and Phil Rosenthal, two former lawyers who have traded in the practice of law for the business world. Fastcase is an online legal research engine that can be best described as an easy to use, high quality alternative to Westlaw and LexisNexis. Started in 1999, the company is building steam now as more and more bar associations and mid-sized law firms begin to try the new service.

“What we try to do here is use new technology to make legal research easier and faster,” explains CEO Ed Walters. Eight and a half years after its inception, the company is pushing forward faster than ever. They currently have 300,000 subscribers, most of which come from Bar Association memberships who offer it free for their members. For example, if you are a member of the Virginia State Bar, you have access to all of Fastcase’s services for free.

The theory, an easily searchable database of case law, with results displayed exactly the way you need them, is catching on at firms who have been hesitant to change. They allow each user to customize their search results through a number of different ways, including showing those cases that are cited the most first. This makes sorting through cases faster and more efficient, saving lawyers time and money.

There is no new system to learn, no extensive training required, and the future is very bright. They are introducing a new interactive timeline display, as a much more appealing way to view search results. This viewer display cases in a search along a timeline, charting the cases relevance as compared to similar results. This makes finding the right cases easier than ever before.

In addition, Fastcase plans to launch a new service later this year. State statutes, which have previously been difficult to find and maneuver on the web, will now be part of the Fastcase database. Statutes from all 50 states will be searchable, and easily viewed on the website. This is a great addition to Fastcase’s extensive information center, which includes the largest free law library in the world, located at plol.org. “We are democratizing the assets of the law,” Ed says as he explains why people have found Fastcase to be so helpful. It is clear that there is a new face in the legal research industry that will be here to stay.

Post a Comment   |   (4) Comments  |   Permanent Link  Go Back


CLE in the News: June 17, 2008
Posted: June 17th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: CLE Programming, The News Beat

CLE in the News: June 17, 2008

The Wisconsin Continuing Legal Education requirement is 30 credits every two years, including 3 hours of legal ethics. The reason I bring this up is because a Wisconsin criminal attorney made news this week for failing to comply with his CLE Requirements. The story, outlined in the Wisconsin Law Journal, explains that the attorney, Paul Polacek, currently has multiple cases pending.

His suspension, though it may be short, has resulted in a delay in at least one of his cases. He missed the February 1 reporting date, but claims that he has since completed his requirements and is waiting for approval. If Wisconsin allowed their CLE credits to be completed online, Mr. Polacek could have easily completed his credits quickly and easily on Lawline.com. Maybe next time.

Post a Comment   |   (2) Comments  |   Permanent Link  Go Back


Warner Norcross & Judd Take On Climate Change
Posted: June 16th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: Law Firms, SHOWCASE CORNER

Warner Norcross & Judd Take On Climate Change

There is no debating that climate change is a topic that the whole world needs increased awareness. And with a growing movement the size of this one, there is sure to be plenty of legislation to come in the area. To date, there has been very little signed into law in the area of climate change. But that does not mean that lawyers and law firms should not be actively pursuing the field.

One law firm that is taking advantage of this opportunity is Warner Norcross & Judd. The Michigan based firm has formed a Climate Change Practice Group that is built to handle their clients’ many needs in regards to climate change. With one of the largest Environmental Law Practices around, Warner Norcross brings to the table the experience needed to serve companies and industries devoted to climate change initiatives.

“Right now it is our job to keep these clients informed and let them know what to look for,” said Climate Change Practice Group chair Daniel DeWitt, “the nature of our services will be shaped by the coming legislation.” For now, they are concentrated on looking out for the best interests of clients that fall into the broad realm of climate change. They have helped negotiate alternative energy contracts and green building designs.

The Climate Change Practice Group is a cross-discipline group made up of environmental law practitioners, litigators, corporate attorneys, and real estate attorneys. Also, there are lawyers in the group from the Government Affairs Practice that spend time lobbying for certain climate change issues.

This is clearly a growing sector and one that no law firm, or business for that matter, can ignore. Warner Norcross & Judd are staying one step ahead of the curve. As more opportunities present themselves, and more laws are passed, other law firms are going to be quick to follow. Daniel DeWitt describes the movement best when he says, “Climate change is an issue of the utmost importance because it is going to change the way the world works.”

Post a Comment   |   (3) Comments  |   Permanent Link  Go Back


Brown Rudnick's Commitment to Clean Technology
Posted: June 13th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category:

Brown Rudnick's Commitment to Clean Technology

Green is the new White. As the push towards sustainability and renewable energies becomes more mainstream, companies in those emerging sectors need legal representation. More and more, large white collar law firms are setting up practices to deal with these types of clients.

One law firm that has excelled in this area is Brown Rudnick LLP. Brown Rudnick, an international law firm with offices in the US and Europe, has created a Cleantech team comprised of lawyers across a broad range of practice areas. The newly formed team is charged with serving the needs of companies and investors within the emerging clean technology sector.

“Cleantech can mean a lot of different things,” says Mark Dorff, one of the team’s practice leaders, “we look at ourselves as a service provider, serving the infinite needs of clients within this sector.” Mark is a partner who works out of the firm’s London office. He works as a practice leader for the Cleantech team, responsible for coordinating cross-disciplinary initiatives for many clients.

The Cleantech Team at Brown Rudnick is involved with three main categories of clients. The first is entrepreneurs and businesses in the clean technology sector, including wind farms and other technologies that are working towards efficiency. The second are the investors, such as private equities and venture capitalists, who are investing in clean technology. The third category is comprised of financial intermediaries working with companies in this important sector.

One of the major things that makes the Cleantech Team work is the experience that Brown Rudnick brings to the table. Though this team is newly created, it includes a broad group of practices that have been well established for up to 20 years. It is part of a commitment by the firm to serve the needs of these clients on a larger scale.

In the broad scope of green initiatives, this is a very important area. As law firms strive to serve the needs of green companies, and begin to implement initiatives to go green themselves, we must remember that it takes commitment. Commitment to clients, commitment to moving forward, and a commitment to the community as a whole will prove to be vital. And in the end, it just makes sense, both financially and operationally.

Post a Comment   |   (1) Comments  |   Permanent Link  Go Back


Thursday Attorney Malpractice Update 6/12/08
Posted: June 12th, 2008
By: Andrew Bluestone, Esq.
Category: Attorney Malpractice

Thursday Attorney Malpractice Update 6/12/08

Pennsylvania Legal Malpractice and Ballard Spahr

Law.Com reports that the law firm of Ballard Spahr won a jury trial yesterday.  Beyond the usual legal malpractice issues and testimony, there was plenty of star power [in a law sort of way] as " famed Florida litigator Roy Black of Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf represented Epstein along with Boca Raton-based Lance W. Shinder and local counsel Marc R. Steinberg, managing partner of Rubin Glickman Steinberg & Gifford in Lansdale, Pa.

His attorneys said in court documents that Crusader was never mentioned at the meeting with Epstein and Kaplinsky and that Epstein met with Crusader, and its then-executive -- now gubernatorial candidate -- Tom Knox, on his own in February 1999. "

"A Montgomery County jury vindicated Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll on Monday in a breach of fiduciary duty suit brought against the firm by a man seeking between $17 million to $30 million in lost profits plus interest and punitive damages.

Plaintiff Saul R. Epstein originally claimed the firm and Alan S. Kaplinsky, the firm's consumer financial services group chairman, committed legal malpractice, breached their fiduciary duty and interfered with a prospective contractual relationship, according to court documents. In Epstein v. Kaplinsky, Epstein claimed the firm shared his prospective business interests with another firm client involved in similar work, according to court documents.

An 11-to-1 jury found that Ballard Spahr owed a duty to Epstein but found by the same margin that neither Kaplinsky nor the firm breached that duty, according to Ballard Spahr partner Darryl May who acted as in-house counsel for the firm during the case. "

Right to Independent Counsel in Malpractice Cases

This case, Elacqua v. Physicians Reciprocal Insurers is a medical malpractice matter, in which the doctors had both covered and non-covered claims against them  Naturally, the insurance company had coverage for certain of the claims.  Although this case is in the medical malpractice area, it is fully applicable to legal malpractice.

The insurer was under an obligation to inform the doctors that they could have independent counsel, at the insurer's cost, to represent them.  The failure to inform the doctors could amount to deceptive business practices under Business Law 349. 

The NYLJ reports: "Drs. Mary S. Elacqua and William Hennessey alleged deceptive business practices because they were not told they were entitled to choose independent counsels, at the insurance company's expense, to represent them when a conflict of interest arose between covered and uncovered claims in the malpractice case against them. They were each represented by lawyers assigned by their insurance company.

The state Court of Appeals recognized the obligation by an insurer to provide independent representation to insureds in Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Goldfarb, 53 NY2d 392 (1981), the Third Department panel said.
Yet, according to last week's ruling, a lawyer for Physicians' Reciprocal Insurers and the company's general counsel both acknowledged that its "practice is not to inform its insureds with whom it has conflicts that they have the right to select independent counsel at defendant's expense." In fact, the Third Department noted that in a 2005 ruling in the same case, Elacqua v. Physicians' Reciprocal Insurers, 21 AD3d 707, it confirmed that insurers have an "affirmative obligation" to inform insureds of their rights.

"Here, the partial disclaimer letters sent by defendant to its insureds - including plaintiffs - failed to inform them that they had the right to select independent counsel at defendant's expense, instead misadvising that plaintiffs could retain counsel to protest their uninsured interests 'at [their] own expense,'" Justice Karen K. Peters wrote for the panel. "Equally disturbing is the fact that defendant continued to send similar letters to its insureds, failing to inform them of their rights, even after this Court's pronouncement in Elacqua I."

Bankruptcy Trustee's Action in Legal Malpractice against Alston & Bird

Law.Com reports that "Alston & Bird and and the bankruptcy trustee for one of its former clients, the beleaguered Friedman's Jewelers Inc., are on the verge of settling a suit over allegations that the firm committed legal malpractice. "

"Alston & Bird, which served as Friedman's outside general counsel from the 1990s until the company terminated their relationship in 2004, contributed to some of those troubles, according to Alan Cohen, Friedman's bankruptcy trustee. He filed a complicated adversary complaint on behalf of the Friedman's Creditor Trust against the law firm and five other defendants in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Georgia in January 2007.

The first claim is that Alston & Bird committed legal malpractice by failing to disclose material facts related to Friedman's $85 million investment in Crescent Jewelers Inc., which became irrecoverable when Crescent declared bankruptcy in 2004.

In the second claim, the trustee complains about the fees Alston charged Friedman's. He claims that Alston took $5 million in legal fees but did not give an equivalent value of services. In the third claim, the trustee alleges that Friedman's -- while it was insolvent -- paid Alston almost $700,000. That's more than the company should have paid, given its financial posture, under the Bankruptcy Code, according to the trustee.

Now, more than a year later, the parties are close to striking a deal to resolve those disputes. "

Legal Malpractice, Judiciary Law 487 and Frivolous Conduct

The case of Rozen v. Nite Rider Group, Inc. seems to be going on in three different venues.  There was the original case, based on loans and property noldings, there is a legal malpractice case, and apparently there is also a Judiciary Law 487 case too. "This motion by former defense counsel, Russ & Russ, P.C., Jay Edmond Russ, Daniel P. Rosenthal, Kenneth J. Lauri and Ira Levine, (the Russ attorneys), for an order dismissing the parties' motions for sanctions on the moving parties for engaging in frivolous conduct as defined in 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, or, in the alternative, staying a hearing on the aforesaid motions, dated March 18, 2008, and March 24, 2008, until a decision is rendered on the Russ attorneys' motions to dismiss the complaint in an action brought against them by Rozen for breach of section 487 of the Judiciary Law (pending under Index Number 19442/2007), and another action brought against them for malpractice (pending under Index Number 01462/2008)"

Here, "After the trial concluded, the plaintiffs became aware that a certain parcel of real property situate in Mattituck, New York, which had been the subject of financial transactions between the parties, and on which it was understood at the time of trial that defendant Sally Omar held an option, was no longer subject to that option. The option had, on May 12, 2007, been assigned by Omar to her attorneys, seemingly in lieu of payment of fees. Plaintiffs assert that settlement offers extended to the Omar defendants, and their business entities, were not transmitted to them by defense counsel insofar as the offers involved the Mattituck property to which the defendants no longer held any interest."

Now, sanctions are sought against the attorneys, even though they are no longer in the case. "In March of 2008 both the plaintiffs and the defendants moved for a hearing to impose sanctions on Russ & Russ, P.C., and those professionals affiliated with them, for engaging in [*2]litigation conduct which satisfies the definition of frivolous conduct as set forth in 22 NYCRR § 130-1.1. (Motion Sequence No. 008 and No. 009.). It is alleged that the conduct of the moving parties undermined the integrity of the judicial process and increased the legal fees of the plaintiffs. Specifically that : "It was the intention of the Russ & Russ Attorneys to take the option to the Mattituck property from the Omars and then cause the Rozens to incur extensive delays and expense so that they would relinquish their rights to the Mattituck property without the knowledge that the Russ & Russ Attorneys sought to develop and profiteer from the property." Rosen OSC dated March 18, 2008, ¶ 11. "

Post a Comment   |   (0) Comments  |   Permanent Link  Go Back


Lawline.com Launches Exclusive Online CLE Partnership with New York County Lawyers Association
Posted: June 11th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: CLE Programming, Lawline.com, Press Release

PRNewswire / New York, NY - June 10 -- Lawline.com, a leading online provider of continuing legal education and law-related programming, is proud to announce a partnership with the New York County Lawyers Association. Beginning June 1, 2008, Lawline.com started to broadcast NYCLA's lectures on its website. "We are looking forward to working with NYCLA, one of the city's oldest and most influential bar associations in the city," said David Schnurman, President of Lawline.com. "We are pleased to be able to offer NYCLA's extensive catalog of courses to our database of legal professionals.

In recognition of New York County Lawyers Associations' 100th year anniversary, Lawline.com will be offering a special introductory Centennial Anniversary Package to its subscribers. You can view the package, which includes all 24 Mandatory CLE Credits at http://www.lawline.com/cle/view-bundles.php?state=ny&category=24. "We are thrilled to be partnering with Lawline.com to bring quality CLE programming to the web," said Ann B. Lesk, President of NYCLA. "By merging NYCLA CLE Institute's superior content with Lawline.com's user-friendly technology, we are confident that we are forming an unbeatable combination."

Lawline.com's mission in partnering with NYCLA is to provide an online environment to facilitate the learning process through its high quality CLE programs that are intuitive and easy to use. Lawline.com reaches a national audience with courses approved in 36 states and currently offers hundreds of hours of CLE programming in all practice areas.

About Lawline

Lawline.com, based in New York, is the leading provider of online legal audio and video programming on the internet. Lawline.com's leadership in providing expert legal information and CLE programming has been recognized by American Lawyer Media, the New York Law Journal and the Social Law Library. In addition to providing legal education on the internet, Lawline is one of the first legal talk shows in the New York metropolitan area, with an inventory of over 500 programs over the last 25 years.

About New York County Lawyers Association

The New York County Lawyers' Association turns 100 years old this year. Throughout its history, NYCLA's bedrock principles have been the inclusion of all who wish to join and the active pursuit of legal system reform. Throughout its 100 years, NYCLA has been at the forefront of most legal debates in the country. The Association's founders were and their successors are dedicated to the highest standards for the legal profession and the preservation of justice for all.

Post a Comment   |   (1) Comments  |   Permanent Link  Go Back


New Technology Landscape: Create Your Work-Life Balance
Posted: June 10th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: Career Corner, Opinion Corner

New Technology Landscape: Create Your Work-Life Balance

As a lawyer, you are never far away from your work. Essentially, to serve your clients best, you have to be available most of the time. It is a job and an industry that requires long hours and a lot of extra effort. And now, with new technology that makes working from home and on the road easier and more convenient than ever, that trend is only increasing.

Many people thought that with the onset of new technologies like cell phones, PDA’s, and virtual machines would limit work hours because it gives people more freedom. The result, however, was the opposite. All of the sudden, when you leave the office you are not leaving work behind. Hours got longer because the boundaries between work life and home life disappeared.

There have been many recent news stories about the excessive use of blackberries and mobile web devices to check email and catch up on work into the late hours of the night. It causes increased stress at home and limits time with family and friends when you used to be more available. This leads to unhappy spouses, limited time with children, and less free time during vacation or off days.

It is important to remember that technology is meant to help make our lives easier. Set limits on yourself when you are away from the office. Start out by trying to designate hours without any mobile devices. Focus your attention on family and non-work activities so you can get back into more of a balance between work and home. Though work is important, and the satisfaction of your clients is vital, you cannot let that take over your life. Technology is a great thing, just don’t let it control you.

Post a Comment   |   (2) Comments  |   Permanent Link  Go Back


The Five Themes of Success
Posted: June 6th, 2008
By: Frank Furbacher
Category: Business Development Skills, Career Corner, Entrepreneurship

The Five Themes of Success

In entrepreneurship there are “Five Theme of Success” that are preached to people looking to start their own company; be a doer, don’t be afraid to make mistakes, never forget the importance of networking, don’t listen to the negativity of nay-sayers, and help out others without wanting anything in return. The same could easily be said to anyone looking to start their own law firm, no matter what age the lawyer is. 
 
Everyday in the business world there are employees who decide they are fed up with their boss, employees, or partners, and the headaches they receive on the job could easily be fixed if they started their own company, or for our purposes, their own law firm and worked for themselves. What this attorney would become if they did start their own firm is a “Legal Entrepreneur."
 
To simplify our matter even more, let us look at this from a completely different, younger perspective. Let us call this new business a lemonade stand, like the one we used to set up in front of our house when we were children. 
 
With every new lemonade stand a child starts up, like any business an adult forms, comes the same basic challenges. We’ll call them the “Fundamentals of a Business.” 
 
The first fundamental is creativity. Creativity is the glue of entrepreneurship. To come up with this idea of a lemonade stand was creativity in itself. The fact that you want to create your own firm is a creative idea. The ideas that go through your head everyday are all creative. You can ask yourself, “What is the best way to market this,” or, “How can I increase my sales to a different target audience?” Without the idea, where could you start?
 
Next, we come to strategy as our second fundamental of a business. Find out what kind of opportunity you have as a solo practitioner.  Take action and get the deal done. You could be kicking yourself for the next twenty years if you fail to follow your dreams. The motivation you have for starting your own practice should be enough for you get through the questions of whether to go through with it. To start a lemonade stand, all a child needs to do is get the product, create the stand, and start charging. But, of course, there is always more to it to be successful.
 
Financing your move is probably your biggest question. The first person a child will look to for financing for their stand is their parents. Of course if they want to be a real businessman, they will make sure they pay their investor back with a return on it, but as an attorney this may not be as easy. You could potentially be taking a huge financial cut by starting your own firm. But let’s face it, start-up companies are always bootstrapping, which makes it that much more fun.
 
The lemonade that a child sells is their product, and any nearby stands or stores that sell lemonade will be that child’s competition. You, as an attorney, are offering your expertise to represent someone in the court of law, and the fact that you are going to make sure your clients get first-class treatment and the utmost attention is what will separate you from the rest of the area’s attorneys, right? Going from a large firm to your own puts you more in control of your clients and yourself. You are now making decisions such as who to represent, how to decorate the office, what paper to buy for the printer…etc. Mom’s homemade recipe for lemonade might be enough to separate you from the competition, so why not take a hint? Be yourself and show the respect to your clients that you would want from anyone representing you. It will get you further with a client, make them more comfortable, and put you in a position to really feel passionate about what you are doing.
 
Maybe being a solo practitioner isn’t what you had in mind. You would much rather have a partner who shares the same passions and goals as you.  Sign them up. When was the last time you saw only one child working a lemonade stand? There is always one child behind the counter and the other is screaming on the top of their lungs to passing cars. Some say partnerships are disasters, but what I am telling is it will pan out if it is meant to be, and it will help you tremendously in the beginning phases. Come to think of it, when you have the money, you will hire that secretary, clerk, and office manager, just like children recruiting other friends to help with the stand when it becomes more successful. When you find yourself more worried about making copies than your actual legal work, it will be worth hiring the help. Don’t rush into it, but don’t be afraid either.
 
Marketing may be what separates the successful lemonade stand, from the one that ends up drinking their entire product at the end of the day. Getting your name out there is vital to any start-up company. Whether its newspaper ads, word of mouth, a great location, or a fancy 1-800 number, finding the best way to advertise will save you money. Let’s face it; a lemonade stand on a cold, rainy day isn’t exactly marketable. But if you have that same stand on the hottest day of the year, the sky is the limit! Research this area and make sure you know what works for you. Networking is a great way to market yourself, so attend conventions, seminars, and cocktail receptions to meet people. The more people that know you, the stronger you become. Another suggestion is offer favors to people and expect nothing in return. Having karma on your side can only help a start-up, and you should want to be a good person!
 
There will always be people trying to bring you down during your new endeavor. They are called the "nay-sayers." If you let these people get to you, you’re going to be hurting and so will your business. You know who to believe and you know who to trust, but nothing can get you off course if it is a passion of yours that you are pursuing with your heart. Make sure you have a mentor, someone who has done something like this before, to go to for advice but will not do any of the work. His words will be priceless to you because he has gone through the same experiences you will.
 
Finally please keep in mind the “Five Themes of Success”; be a doer, don’t be afraid to make mistakes, never forget the importance of networking, don’t listen to the negativity of nay-sayers, and help out others without wanting anything in return. If you truly believe you can do something, then you will let nothing get in your way. Continue to pursue your dreams, and I wish you the best of luck!
 

Frank Furbacher Jr. is currently a senior at Manhattanville College. He is the President of the Student Government Association and a member of the varsity baseball team. Frank is an entrepreneur himself, and an aspiring law school student. You can contact Frank at Frank@lawline.com with any questions or comments.

Post a Comment   |   (1) Comments  |   Permanent Link  Go Back


Complete All Your Illinois Continuing Legal Education before the Deadline
Posted: June 5th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category:

Complete All Your Illinois Continuing Legal Education before the Deadline

CHICAGO, June 3 /PRNewswire/ -- For the first year ever, Illinois lawyers are required to complete mandatory Continuing Legal Education credits. The deadline, as imposed by the MCLE Board of Illinois, is June 30th. With the deadline so close and many attorneys still short on credits, Lawline.com is offering last minute savings on their Illinois One-Click Bundles.

Lawline.com hopes to show attorneys the many advantages of taking CLE courses online. First, it gives you more freedom to choose the course topics that are right for you. It offers the convenience of taking courses anywhere, anytime, without the hassle of traveling or rearranging your schedule. And with new technology, it is easier and more affordable than ever before.

Illinois CLE Bundles on Lawline.com fulfill all 20 MCLE credits, including 4 hours of Ethics/Professionalism. This offers a quick and easy way for attorneys to finish up their CLE requirements in the weeks leading up to the deadline. The cost of this bundle is only $299. You can view the Illinois Bundles at http://www.lawline.com/cle/view-bundles.php?category=25.

In addition to the Illinois Bundles, attorneys can choose to purchase a custom bundle of courses that are more interesting and relevant to their area of practice. This option can be attractive as they continue to grow their course offerings in the state of Illinois by partnering with local law firms and bar associations to deliver their programs online.

Lawline.com has been providing cutting-edge Continuing Legal Education courses online since 1999, the year the first mandatory requirements were introduced in New York. Since then, they have expanded to more than 30 states nationwide. Their courses give attorneys an easy to use, interesting, and up to date refresher of valuable legal topics.

Post a Comment   |   (0) Comments  |   Permanent Link  Go Back


Lawline.com Faculty Member in the News
Posted: June 5th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: Career Corner, Lawline.com, Lawyer Profiles, The News Beat

Lawline.com Faculty Member in the News

Earlier this week, Melvyn Weiss, Plaintiff’s Attorney with the firm Milberg LLP, was sentenced to 30 months in jail for pleading guilty to participating in a conspiracy whereby plaintiffs were paid a kickback in lucrative class action settlements. His attorney, Ben Brafman, is a well respected criminal lawyer in New York, and a Lawline.com faculty member.

We caught up with Mr. Brafman earlier today and asked him about the sentence. He mentioned that the 30 months was below the maximum sought by the government of 33 months, but more than what he had been hoping for. He said that he understood why the court had imposed such a sentence, with Mr. Weiss’s age and years of respectable work helping to keep the sentence below the maximum that the government had been seeking.

This marks the end of a 7 year investigation into the activities of the firm and the suspected conspiracy. Mr. Weiss pled guilty earlier this year and had been awaiting a sentence until earlier this week. He is to report to jail in West Virginia this August. For more information, see the Wall Street Journal article June 3rd.

Post a Comment   |   (0) Comments  |   Permanent Link  Go Back


The Green Guide for Lawyers
Posted: June 4th, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: The News Beat

The Green Guide for Lawyers

A few weeks ago I posted an article about law firms going green. If you want to take a look, here it is. Well today I came across a blog that referenced a guide for law firms that are committed to going green. The guide, appropriately titled The Green Guide for Lawyers, can be downloaded for free from this website. It was put together by the Meritas Leadership Institute as a roadmap for lawyers and law firms who want to put in place the initiatives that it takes to start to be a green firm.

The document divides initiatives up into three tiers, and then categorizes them under the headings People, Planet, and Profit. It uses a Triple Bottom Line approach for law firms to measure their sustainability and environmental consciousness. I would recommend a quick read through of the guide to any lawyer who may think it is necessary to start to go green. It is not as hard as you may think.

Post a Comment   |   (1) Comments  |   Permanent Link  Go Back


Do Lawyers Have Bounce?
Posted: June 2nd, 2008
By: Zach Heller
Category: Business Development Skills, Career Corner, SHOWCASE CORNER

Do Lawyers Have Bounce?

Did you ever wish that you had more confidence in the decisions that you made, both personally and professionally, in your day to day life? Of course you did, we all do. Well there is a new book from prominent speaker, author, and entrepreneur Barry Moltz, entitled Bounce, that you should check out.

As lawyers, we are constantly seeking to improve ourselves professionally by learning how to serve our clients more effectively. Sometimes it can be a struggle to reach new clients, work through existing cases, and keep up with all of our professional relationships at once. Bounce takes you through stories of failure and success to show you that life is supposed to be made up of ups and downs. It is the low points that make you appreciate the high points, and the high points that keep you pushing forward through the low points. 

True business confidence is developed through a number of different experiences, all of which lead you to where you are today, and where you will be in the years to come. Failure is no fun, we all know that. But it happens every day. Do not fear it or run from it, use it to drive you to success. 

In the end, you will be left feeling motivated to conquer whatever challenge lay ahead. Whether it is a new case that you are struggling to take on, or a new marketing strategy that you’ve been meaning to develop, you will be ready to approach it with a new found confidence and determination.

Post a Comment   |   (1) Comments  |   Permanent Link  Go Back

Search Posts
Recent Posts

View All Posts

What's the Deal with Law Firm IPO's
Posted: August 26th, 2008

Police Brutality in NYC: Lawline Faculty Member in the News
Posted: August 26th, 2008

Faculty Newsletter Announcement
Posted: August 25th, 2008

Friday Five: Build Internship Programs
Posted: August 22nd, 2008

JD Supra Creates Legal Writing Community
Posted: August 20th, 2008

Archived Posts
2008


2007

Blogroll

Blawg Directory

Law.com Legal Blog Watch

Legal Business Development

Legal Marketing Blog (Tom Kane)

Make Rain Without the Pain

New York Attorney Malpractice Blog

TrueNYC Blog

WSJ Law Blog

Simple Justice

Amazing Firms, Amazing Practices

The Lawyer Coach

Adam Smith, Esq.

Profiting with Public Relations

Legal Ease Blog

Chuck Newton

Idealawg

The Mac Lawyer

Gersh Blog

Build a Solo Practice

Be Innovation

The PR Lawyer

Leadership for Lawyers

Blog Catalog